Which of the following is NOT a right of the defendant?

The right to self-incrimination is a legal protection afforded to individuals, particularly in criminal proceedings. This right allows a defendant to refuse to provide testimony or evidence that could potentially incriminate themselves. This principle is rooted in the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which assures individuals that they cannot be compelled to testify against themselves in a criminal case.

In contrast, the other options presented—such as the right to a speedy jury trial, the right to appeal, and the right to cross-examine witnesses—are all affirmative rights or privileges that a defendant possesses during legal proceedings. The right to a speedy jury trial ensures that the accused is tried in a timely manner, minimizing lengthy pre-trial detentions. The right to appeal provides a mechanism for defendants to challenge convictions or sentences that they believe are unjust. The right to cross-examine witnesses allows the defendant to question the evidence and credibility presented against them, which is a fundamental aspect of ensuring a fair trial.

Thus, while the rights mentioned in the other options empower defendants within the judicial process, the right to self-incrimination is distinct in that it protects individuals from being forced to engage in self-damning testimonies, highlighting its unique role rather than positioning it as an active 'right'