Which of the following is NOT a factor to consider when initiating a frisk?

When determining whether to conduct a frisk, officers must consider specific factors that contribute to establishing reasonable suspicion about a person's potential threat or their involvement in a criminal act. Bulges in clothing are significant, as they may indicate the presence of weapons or other dangerous items that could pose a threat. The time and place of the encounter also play a crucial role; for instance, if an officer is in a high-crime area late at night, the context may heighten the need for a frisk.

Additionally, the type of crime involved is important. If an officer is addressing a situation linked to violent crimes, the possibility of encountering weapons increases, which further justifies a frisk.

Vehicle ownership, on the other hand, is not a direct factor leading to reasonable suspicion for conducting a frisk. While it may provide some context in terms of a person's association with a vehicle or potential involvement in a crime, it does not independently justify the need for a frisk. The focus during a frisk is primarily on the immediate behavior and surrounding circumstances of the individual at that moment, rather than their ownership of a vehicle. Thus, vehicle ownership is not a pertinent factor to consider in the decision-making process for a frisk.