Which of the following accurately reflects misdemeanor arrest procedures?

The chosen answer rightly reflects the established legal principles regarding misdemeanor arrests. In general, law enforcement officers are permitted to make arrests without a warrant for misdemeanor offenses only if the crime occurs in their immediate presence. This means that if an officer witnesses a misdemeanor being committed, they can act on it without needing a warrant first.

However, if the offense has occurred but is not witnessed by the officer, a warrant would typically be required to make an arrest. This procedural guideline is designed to balance the need for law enforcement to act swiftly in response to crimes while also ensuring that individuals' rights are protected through the warrant requirement for offenses not witnessed firsthand by the officer.

In contrast, the other options suggest ideas that do not accurately represent the legal framework governing misdemeanor arrests. The notion that officers can arrest without a warrant at any time disregards the legal requirements surrounding when warrants are necessary. Similarly, the assertion that misdemeanor charges cannot lead to arrest is incorrect—misdemeanor charges often do lead to arrests when appropriate. Lastly, the claim that surveillance evidence is required for an arrest imposes an unnecessary restriction that isn't mandated by law in the context of misdemeanors. Therefore, the selected answer (B) best captures the legal requirements for arresting someone for a