When is use of force for control typically categorized?

The use of force for control is typically categorized in the context of state actions against individuals, making it relevant in scenarios where the state is involved in enforcing laws or maintaining order. This categorization is reflected in the judicial doctrine surrounding the use of force, particularly in situations where law enforcement interacts with civilians.

In the context of "State v. Person" scenarios, the focus is on how state actors, such as police officers, deploy force and the legal implications that arise from those actions. These cases often examine whether the level of force used was reasonable and justified under the circumstances, taking into account the threat posed by the person involved.

The other options, while related to the broader context of the legal implications of force by law enforcement, do not specifically address the classification of use of force as it pertains directly to the actions of the state against individuals during real-time incidents. Civil suits against officers often arise after the fact and involve liability but do not categorize the use itself. Criminal cases involving state action may involve elements of force, but the categorization specifically in terms of "use of force for control" fits more neatly into "State v. Person" cases. Civil rights violations address a broader spectrum of individual rights that can be infringed upon by the